This story was published Sun, Aug 8, 2004 By the Herald staff The potential for an accident at the Umatilla Chemical Depot is not just
theoretical. In March 1944, a massive explosion of a bunker full of conventional bombs
at the depot leveled a concrete igloo, reducing it to ash and shattering
windows as far away as Pendleton. Five men and one woman were killed in a blast so violent the only trace
of remains was the woman's torso. The recollection of that event 50 years ago remains vivid to Fay Moses,
81. "When it went off, I jumped up and screamed. The entire house shook,"
she said. Moses said she knew immediately the blast came from the depot. The Army wants to avoid a repeat of that disaster and is making every
effort to ensure the aging weapons stockpile is disposed of safely. But
Moses knows first hand what can go wrong. She had gone to work at the munitions plant straight out of high school
and worked there off and on until she retired in the early 1980s. Moses said chatter around the depot's water coolers didn't change much
over the years. The dangers posed by long-term storage of chemical munitions
have long been a topic of concern. "Thirty years ago, they were talking about what they'd do with the
depot once the nerve agent is gone," Moses said. "That's how long
they've been working to get rid of this damn stuff." When the bombs exploded at Umatilla in 1944, there were no pallets of
deadly nerve agents in the concrete bunkers. Until 1964, Umatilla only had
caches of conventional weapons. But during the Cold War, Russia and the United States raced to see who
could produce the most chemical weaponry. Russia led the world, amassing
40,000 tons of deadly chemical munitions. The United States came in a close
second, with nearly 32,000 tons. Copyright 2002 Tri-City Herald. All rights reserved. This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Deadly 1944 blast shows potential for disaster at depot