Published Oct. 20, 2001 HERMISTON - A Multnomah Circuit Court judge is being hailed as a hero
by anti-incinerator activists for ruling that they can question the state
in court about the safety of burning nerve agents at the Umatilla Chemical
Depot. Judge Michael H. Marcus said Thursday that a group of Umatilla and Morrow
county citizens, known as GASP, could grill the Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality in court about its decision to grant incineration permits to the
Army. "This is a huge, huge decision for Oregonians," said Stuart
Sugarman, a Portland attorney representing GASP. "This Portland judge has the power to shut down the incineration
complex and order it to be disassembled," Sugarman said. "This
is the first step toward doing just that." Judge Marcus said the public has a right to raise concerns about "whether
and how to permit the incineration of hundreds of tons of deadly waste." However, Marcus said that without a court review he cannot determine
the correctness of DEQ's conclusions about whether the Army intentionally
misrepresented issues involving treating secondary waste on-site and calculating
the number of people who might be at risk during incinerator operations. Marcus based his decision on a recent Supreme Court ruling that allows
a state agency's review process to be questioned before the courts. Marcus
previously had denied GASP's petition twice. Citing the 2000 Supreme Court case, Marcus said, "It now appears
the petitioners were correct about many important issues in this controversy
and about their right to make their record in this court." Specifically, Marcus said, GASP appears to be correct that "secondary
waste-disposal plans will never be employed as contemplated by the existing
permits and that the utility of the carbon filters has yet to be determined
with confidence." His ruling is believed to be the first of its kind in the nation, said
Karyn Jones, a board member for GASP. She said the ruling has given anti-incinerator groups nationwide a "real
hope that alternative technology will be implemented." "Oregonians are not going to put up with incineration any more.
We're going to take control, and we're going to win," Jones said. Jones said the legal challenge is necessary because DEQ officials have
maintained over the years that they have everything at the burn site under
control. "They keep telling us everything is fine. To trust them. Well, I
don't trust them. And I don't trust the Army," she said. Jones said the legal challenge will help ensure the public knows the
risks of incineration. "We want to be able to put these people under oath, where they will
face the possibility of perjury, and then ask them about the safety of burning
nerve agents," Jones said. The DEQ always has provided the public with full disclosure, said Wayne
Thomas, the agency's administrator for the Umatilla Chemical Demilitarization
program. "This is a public process. GASP knows that. There has never been
any question of any improper disclosure here. Everything we have is public
record," Thomas said. Additionally, Thomas said the judge's ruling will not alter the incineration
program. "We are not taking the results of this judge's decision and slowing
anything down. We are going to continue to do things as quickly, efficiently
and successfully as we have been," he said. "We're not changing
anything." Copyright 2002 Tri-City Herald. All rights reserved. This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Oregon judge rules depot questions can be asked