This story was published Thu, Apr 26, 2001 By The Associated Press and Herald staff WASHINGTON - The United States lags far behind schedule in destruction
of its chemical weapon stockpiles and will be unable to meet a 2007 deadline
set by an international treaty, according to an internal Army memo. The memo, made public Wednesday by the watchdog organization Chemical
Weapons Working Group, said the country could require up to 11 extra years
to rid itself of all the weapons. Marilyn Daughdrill, spokeswoman for the Army's Program Manager for Chemical
Demilitarization, verified the memo's authenticity but said it represents
a worst-case scenario. "We still believe the 2007 deadlines are achievable," she said. Congress ordered the military to begin destroying America's 31,496 tons
of nerve agents, mustard gas and other chemical weapons in 1986. In 1997,
the Senate ratified the international Chemical Weapons Convention, which
demands that all such weapons to be destroyed by 2007. Countries are allowed
to seek five-year extensions. In the Northwest, the Army is building a massive incinerator at the depot
just outside of Hermiston to burn the 7.4 million pounds of deadly nerve
and mustard agents stored there. About 22 percent of U.S. weapons have been destroyed so far, according
to the Army. A report last year by the General Accounting Office, the investigative
arm of Congress, faulted the Army's management of the $15 billion chemical
weapons destruction program. The GAO also found the United States probably
would not meet the 2007 deadline. Although construction of the Umatilla Chemical Depot's incinerator is
nearly complete, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality says testing
of the facility likely will be delayed at least six months and incineration
isn't likely to start before 2003. Last May, at an incinerator in Tooele, Utah, a small drop of the deadly
nerve agent sarin leaked from a smokestack. When inhaled, sarin constricts
the lungs and can halt breathing. Though no one was injured in Tooele, the
incident focus attention on the dangers of the weapons destruction program. At a Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing Wednesday, lawmakers
questioned the Army's acting secretary, Joseph Westphal, about the risks
to residents living near chemical weapons stockpiles. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said the program is making "guinea
pigs" out of residents of Anniston, Ala., where one of the stockpiles
is located. Anniston residents have been given survival kits that include
plastic sheets and duct tape to be used to cover windows if a leak is detected. The Appropriations Committee chairman, GOP Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska,
said the Army's pledge of "no deaths" rather than "no exposure"
concerns many in Congress. He promised to find money in the budget that
communities near chemical stockpiles can use for evacuation plans. "This is an enormous risk that I didn't realize people would be
exposed to," Stevens said. Westphal assured the committee the Army is committed to the safe destruction
of the weapons but acknowledged a perception that the program has safety
problems. "We do have an exhaustive chain of command that works, but we need
to make it clearer to communities," he said. Copyright 2002 Tri-City Herald. All rights reserved. This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Weapons destruction lags behind